yahoo observation #3
Everyone here is on to me.
“On to me” meaning this: shortly after I posted the doughnut story, the interview story and the smoking story, one of the web developers passed on the web address to the rest of the team. I kinda expected that, so no big deal. What I didn’t expect was how fast word of mouth spreads.
Visual designer, who isn’t on the webdev team: Hey, your weblog is funny.
Ernie: Hey, glad you like. (pause) So which one of the web developers gave you the url?
Designer: … the web developers? Jane* told me.
Ernie: Who’s Jane?
Designer: She’s in the cubicle next to mine. Another visual designer.
Ernie: I don’t know a Jane. I don’t think so, anyway.
Designer: Oh. Well, I gotta go! Take care!
Ernie: (…do I know a Jane?)
So naturally, I am now competely paranoid and am hesitant to write anything work related on my weblog after alienating every excercising, oatmeal-eating non-smoker at Yahoo!. But even this has backfired:
Web Dev #1: Dude, you don’t write about us anymore. I’ve read that P. Diddy post twenty times.
Ernie: Nah, it’s just that I’ve been busy and…
Web Dev #2: What, are we not good enough for you to write about anymore?
Ernie: What? No! I just don’t wanna get in trouble, that’s all…
Web Dev #3: I’ve walked by Ernie’s cubicle three times doing zany things, hoping I would be blogged. Nothing.
Web Dev #1: Ugh, forget it. Hey everyone, you’re all invited to an oatmeal party in the cafeteria right now, except for Ernie!
Everyone in unison: OATMEAL!!!
Okay, the last two lines were a figment of my imagination. But you get my point.
* “Jane’s” name is changed to protect the innocent. Even though she reads my weblog and probably wouldn’t mind if I used her real name, and is probably offended that I am using an assumed name instead of a real one. Either way, I lose. Maybe I should just post pictures of cats.

47 Comments