6 Comments
User's avatar
Michael Schofield's avatar

Hey there. You should just repost them as new content. Most people probably haven't read them, and consistency is probably more valuable than exclusivity. Look at it like a backlog of stuff you haven't published yet (this year). What's old is new.

Aurea's avatar

I just remembered you today, for some reason, she searched "little yellow different blog" to see if you're still active. I used to read you in the early 2000s, drifted away and now and then wonder how people I used to read and, sometimes, interact with during years are doing now.

Your contents back then speak of the time you were living, I used to love reading you.

Anon's avatar

Maybe a hybrid approach. If a past blog entry is relevant to something you’re writing about now or affecting you today, bring it on over, and write more about its relevancy to current day shenanigans. That would enrich your current content with greater context and save you the headache of lugging the kitchen sink over…perhaps your ADHD brain would love you for that.

Todd Campbell's avatar

Agreed on this - I was an avid reader of your blog back in the day, and agree that pulling relevant content in a slow feed as you're feeling nostalgic makes the most sense and keeps things from becoming an overwhelming effort

Laura Moncur's avatar

I’m not willing to click on anything that calls you a moron. I hate that you can’t back date. I read your ADHD post and for a second I was wondering if you and Kareem were together again. Then I realized that this was probably a backdated post that couldn’t be backdated.

Ernie Hsiung's avatar

So another observation: if you publish a post and immediately backdate it, it doesn't seem to distribute to the list? So that's always fun. But thank you for the reminder to backdate!